Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.420 [SLACK_000634] · slack_pm:msg:04348

Date: 2021-01-18 20:13
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

On the deletions delH69 and delV70. I've cut been chatting with Tommy Lam and he says that for the Guangxi pangos they have two viruses: the original sample from the lung has a deletion of these two amino acids. However, the vero cell isolate does not (i.e. has the insertion). Make sense?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-01-18 19:11 Robert F. Garry open

You may have picked the wrong book of the trilogy https://www.gq.com/story/nicholson-baker-house-holes-book-review "The dirtiest mind in American lit, Nicholson Baker, overshoots with his Seussian smutfest _House of Holes_ How has the English language done without _fuckwizard, manslurp,_and _thundertube?..."_
2021-01-18 19:15 Robert F. Garry open

Thanks for the hard work on the post Eddie -looking great and will be happy to move you anywhere on the list per @Kristian Andersen...
2021-01-18 19:18 Kristian G. Andersen open

Let's move Eddie to the back - makes much more sense, plus I'm an amateur when it comes to this type of stuff - let's make sure you have the bonafide expert to back you up... :wink:
2021-01-18 20:13 Edward C. Holmes

On the deletions delH69 and delV70. I've cut been chatting with Tommy Lam and he says that for the Guangxi pangos they have two viruses: the original sample from the lung has a deletion of these two amino acids. However, the vero cell isolate does not (i.e. has the insertion). Make sense?

Full conversation →