Slack / Private Message Drop — page 420
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000634
← p.419 p.421 → · this page in the original PDF · package
inventiveness of its language.[3][4][5]
[2021-01-18 17:50:42]
[Robert Garry]
Seems like it might be a good source for VoC names though.
[2021-01-18 18:05:38]
[Eddie Holmes]
Excellent idea! I remember trying to read Vox years ago and giving up.
[2021-01-18 19:11:57]
[Robert Garry]
You may have picked the wrong book of the trilogy
https://www.gq.com/story/nicholson-baker-house-holes-book-review "The dirtiest mind in American lit, Nicholson
Baker, overshoots with his Seussian smutfest _House of Holes_ How has the English language done
without _fuckwizard, manslurp,_and _thundertube?..."_
[2021-01-18 19:15:34]
[Robert Garry]
Thanks for the hard work on the post Eddie -looking great and will be happy to move you anywhere on the list per
@Kristian Andersen...
[2021-01-18 19:18:59]
[Kristian Andersen]
Let's move Eddie to the back - makes much more sense, plus I'm an amateur when it comes to this type of stuff -
let's make sure you have the bonafide expert to back you up... :wink:
[2021-01-18 20:13:49]
[Eddie Holmes]
On the deletions delH69 and delV70. I've cut been chatting with Tommy Lam and he says that for the Guangxi
pangos they have two viruses: the original sample from the lung has a deletion of these two amino acids. However,
the vero cell isolate does not (i.e. has the insertion). Make sense?
[2021-01-18 21:17:14]
[Kristian Andersen]
That seems strange... Random insertion in T/C or what you'd see in e.g., SC2? It's not the other way around?
[2021-01-18 21:30:00]
[Eddie Holmes]
I'm pretty sure that's what he said and I was also surprised. I'll double check.
[2021-01-18 21:33:28]
[Kristian Andersen]
That seems really weird - I have a hard time seeing how it could gain an ancestral insert via passage. HOWEVER,
it's possible you have both viruses in the isolate - one major without the insert and one minor with. Then once you
passage, the one with the insert rapidly outcompetes the other. If what you're saying is indeed correct, then I think
this is the most likely explanation
[2021-01-18 21:52:33]
[Eddie Holmes]
Yes, I had the same thought.
[2021-01-19 00:24:28]
[Eddie Holmes]
From Tommy:
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/420
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:04342 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 419–420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04343 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04344 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04345 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04346 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04347 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04348 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04349 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04350 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04351 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04352 | 2021-01-18 | chat message | 420 |
| slack_pm:msg:04353 | 2021-01-19 | chat message | 420 |