COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.372 [SLACK_000586] · slack_pm:msg:03871

Page text: p.372 · original PDF

Date
2021-01-09 10:23
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yup - enhances it by quite a bit

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-01-09 09:14 Robert F. Garry open
    I wouldn't rule-out a phase change. The UK and ZA variants feel like some nonlinear processes occurring. Epistasisis a real thing. Did Doug somehow open the floodgates enabling Nelly, Eeek and Pooh and multiple combinations?On the "up" side it seems to me that at least that a pattern of hotspots for mutations (Xmas card) are starting toemerge. New sampling of the combos as you document above does seem like an ongoing and perhaps acceleratingprocess. Looking ahead I worry about the fertile ground of Africa which has been largely spared being more susceptible to a Phase II variant.
  2. 2021-01-09 10:11 Kristian G. Andersen open
    > I am trying to decide if this is a 'phase-change' in the evolution of the virus (i.e., driven by standing immunity)I have been wondering about this myself - definitely feels like it. The areas where we have seen these popping uphave had a lot of COVID-19 going around, so a fair bit of standing immunity. I absolutely hope not though - it's apretty scary thought and I have no idea how driving vaccines into a raging pandemic will change that landscape.> Pooh - love it :wink:. Bob, how does the RRRAR affect the predicted O-Glyc? Presumably knock out one of the predicted sites? And just to get back to a question we talked about a couple of days ago - (a) might E484K just be overall better atevading immunity or is it just that it (b) changes an important epitope? I have been thinking about this a lot... I had been leaning towards the former, but now I'm getting increasingly concerned it's the latter. Mostly based on this paper: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.06.425392v2.full.pdf. Is it possible that the combo of Doug, Eeek, and Nelly simply leads to a virus that have such a high affinity for ACE2 that the spike-ACE2 interaction more effectively outcompetes spike-NAb binding? Not inconceivable - I mean, take a look at the difference in binding affinity here: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-01-09 at 10.01.04 AM.png]
  3. 2021-01-09 10:12 Kristian G. Andersen open
    We're talking orders of magnitude difference in binding affinity - that's not nothing....
  4. 2021-01-09 10:21 Robert F. Garry open
    Looks like Eeek even though it doesn't seem to contact ACE2 nevertheless can enhance binding when coupled with Nelly. Surprising but perhaps not shocking.
  5. 2021-01-09 10:23 Kristian G. Andersen
    Yup - enhances it by quite a bit
  6. 2021-01-09 10:29 Robert F. Garry open
    Poor preserved 2/3 predicted O-glycans just like Pooh.
  7. 2021-01-09 10:32 Robert F. Garry open
    Immune escape plus enhanced fitness is ......worrisome.
  8. 2021-01-09 10:32 Kristian G. Andersen open
    That's to put it mildly...
  9. 2021-01-09 10:34 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Also, this is basically the final confirmation that @Andrew Rambaut was absolutely correct in ringing the big redalarm bell:https://twitter.com/LindorffLarsen/status/1347916349704646656?s=20Looks like the doubling rate might be a little less in DK than UK, but clearly same trajectory.

Full conversation →