Chat message

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

1. 2021-01-02 12:25 Andrew Rambaut open
   He is just trying to squirm out of the hole he dug himself.
2. 2021-01-02 12:26 Andrew Rambaut open
   Both lineages clearly do stand out. Sure there are a handful of individual sequences that stick out as much but Isuspect most of these are from those immunocompromised patient papers like the one in NEJM
3. 2021-01-02 12:35 Kristian G. Andersen
   Sometimes it's so much easier to just say "shit, I was wrong", instead of proving that you're ignorant to basic phylogenetics and epi. It's a little shocking to be honest - I mean, the guy's been writing papers on this stuff...
4. 2021-01-02 12:37 Kristian G. Andersen open
   Spoke to the Danes this morning and saw some additional data not yet public - essentially the same picture as theUK, so this looks to be real-real. @Andrew Rambaut - they mentioned that the UK had tested the virus against convalescent plasma and there was_no_ effect on neutralization? I'm not quite sure that has actually been done yet - do you know?
5. 2021-01-02 12:41 Andrew Rambaut open
   I have not heard the neutralization information yet - but I have been off the daily calls. I guess this was done in PHEColindale so they may have talked to Denmark directly.
6. 2021-01-02 12:41 Andrew Rambaut open
   Just been chatting with Mads and have offered to help them set up a simple BEAST run to estimate the growth rate for the initial stages. Might be a bit too little data just now.
7. 2021-01-02 12:42 Andrew Rambaut open
   They clearly have one main lineage that is growing (and a handful of other introductions that are probably going nowhere).

Full conversation →