COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.330-331 [SLACK_000544] · slack_pm:msg:03478

Page text: p.330, p.331 · original PDF

Date
2020-12-20 14:11
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes
Topics
Intelligence community assessments

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

That is weird. The Australian (from Victoria) cluster didn't take off but the circumstances here are not like US/Europe because there is strong intervention. The lineage that did take off in Victoria a little later did so because it was associated with a super-spreading event.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
The lineage that did take off in Victoria a little later did so because it was associated with a super-spreading event. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-12-20 13:32 Andrew Rambaut open
    Best we can hope for is that it isn't more transmissible and gets eliminated by the new lock down measures. A worse case is that the measures knock every thing else out.
  2. 2020-12-20 13:33 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yup!
  3. 2020-12-20 13:33 Andrew Rambaut open
    I hope it turns out we are wrong and it is not transmissible - it is the right decision not to wait to find out I think.
  4. 2020-12-20 13:35 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Agreed - this is a perfect example where we can't wait for scientific certainty, but need to react immediately anddecisively. No pussyfooting around. Also, I find it hilarious that we find ourselves in 1/"Virologists look at a mutation and assume it is adaptive,evolutionary biologists assume it isn't. Neither are right all the time" :wink:
  5. 2020-12-20 14:11 Edward C. Holmes
    That is weird. The Australian (from Victoria) cluster didn't take off but the circumstances here are not like US/Europe because there is strong intervention. The lineage that did take off in Victoria a little later did so because it was associated with a super-spreading event.
  6. 2020-12-20 14:12 Edward C. Holmes open
    As if by magic: [shared file(s): Victoria_trends.pdf]
  7. 2020-12-20 14:23 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Yeah, I don't think we can compare - Australia has this under control, we don't - I'm sure that with Aussie like control measures in place, N501Y wouldn't have had a chance to take off either.
  8. 2020-12-20 14:33 Kristian G. Andersen open
    From all of this, I had the most concise question from Biden TF members this morning "should we ban travel from the UK". I guess when it comes down to it, we all need to be able to take all the science and distill it down into a simple yes/no answer. Easy.

Full conversation →