Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.263 [SLACK_000477] · slack_pm:msg:02749

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Oh, that was South Australia - whatever, one of those :wink:. Yes, that was really terrible.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-11-18 12:51 Edward C. Holmes open

I think we have it resolved now.
2020-11-18 12:52 Edward C. Holmes open

You can just imagine the headlines...
2020-11-18 12:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

South Africa made quite a splash yesterday with the mutants. Things are going well.
2020-11-18 12:53 Edward C. Holmes open

South Australia? Yes, that was dumb. No data at all.
2020-11-18 12:56 Kristian G. Andersen

Oh, that was South Australia - whatever, one of those :wink:. Yes, that was really terrible.
2020-11-18 12:58 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, total shit. Will they ever learn?
2020-11-18 13:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

No.
2020-11-18 13:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

Which, silver lining, should keep us in business for a while.
2020-11-18 13:33 Robert F. Garry open

@trishgreenhalgh has done a pretty good job of tearing into the Danish mask study. Would be "ironic" if a poorlydone epi projection, an old HCQ paper from VJ and a not-so-well done mask study all beat out Proximal Origins onAltmetric....