Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.263 [SLACK_000477] · slack_pm:msg:02745

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I think we have it resolved now.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-11-18 11:34 Kristian G. Andersen open

I DO NOT APPRECIATE THE COMPETITION FROM OTHER DANES. THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE!!!!!!! [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-11-18 at 11.33.32.png]
2020-11-18 12:27 Edward C. Holmes open

Crush them! I just did an interview with a journalist from India and I sent them the proximal origins paper in hope ofsome extra coverage.
2020-11-18 12:47 Kristian G. Andersen open

Here's what I said to Eddie in a text - it's tricky. "Argh, that's a tricky edge case - send it back with "biologicallyimplausible"? The problem is, it's a reject based on peer review and not a reject because of somethingfundamentally wrong that can be glanced by quickly screening it"
2020-11-18 12:51 Edward C. Holmes

I think we have it resolved now.
2020-11-18 12:52 Edward C. Holmes open

You can just imagine the headlines...
2020-11-18 12:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

South Africa made quite a splash yesterday with the mutants. Things are going well.
2020-11-18 12:53 Edward C. Holmes open

South Australia? Yes, that was dumb. No data at all.
2020-11-18 12:56 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh, that was South Australia - whatever, one of those :wink:. Yes, that was really terrible.