Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.263 [SLACK_000477] · slack_pm:msg:02748

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

South Australia? Yes, that was dumb. No data at all.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-11-18 12:47 Kristian G. Andersen open

Here's what I said to Eddie in a text - it's tricky. "Argh, that's a tricky edge case - send it back with "biologicallyimplausible"? The problem is, it's a reject based on peer review and not a reject because of somethingfundamentally wrong that can be glanced by quickly screening it"
2020-11-18 12:51 Edward C. Holmes open

I think we have it resolved now.
2020-11-18 12:52 Edward C. Holmes open

You can just imagine the headlines...
2020-11-18 12:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

South Africa made quite a splash yesterday with the mutants. Things are going well.
2020-11-18 12:53 Edward C. Holmes

South Australia? Yes, that was dumb. No data at all.
2020-11-18 12:56 Kristian G. Andersen open

Oh, that was South Australia - whatever, one of those :wink:. Yes, that was really terrible.
2020-11-18 12:58 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, total shit. Will they ever learn?
2020-11-18 13:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

No.
2020-11-18 13:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

Which, silver lining, should keep us in business for a while.