Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.241 [SLACK_000455] · slack_pm:msg:02508

Date: 2020-10-30 14:54
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

But the "creation date" is stamped in automatically - I don't think they'd have filled in any of the other information until they submitted the data - but that's a good question for Ewan

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-10-30 14:50 Andrew Rambaut open

Could ask Ewan Birney to look into it. Perhaps they have additional logs?
2020-10-30 14:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, probably. It _is_ kinda peculiar to me - these are also all young people.
2020-10-30 14:53 Edward C. Holmes open

When do they add the sample collection date?
2020-10-30 14:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

Once they submit the data
2020-10-30 14:54 Kristian G. Andersen

But the "creation date" is stamped in automatically - I don't think they'd have filled in any of the other information until they submitted the data - but that's a good question for Ewan
2020-10-30 14:55 Kristian G. Andersen open

All the assemblies are on the CNGB too - but no automatic dates stamped. https://db.cngb.org/search/project/CNP0000881/ (submitter being "Weijun Chen" - but obviously a million people with that name)
2020-10-30 14:55 Edward C. Holmes open

So, to be clear, what happened on 12/10? The BGI sent a file to EBI?
2020-10-30 14:56 Kristian G. Andersen open

No, on 12/10 BGI created four data entries with EBI. Data was then later filled in. Typically that's not really how it's done.
2020-10-30 14:57 Kristian G. Andersen open

So creation is 12/10, but upload is at a later date (I don't think we can know when - collection date is 12/26 and the data was released to the public 1/30)

Full conversation →