COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.229 [SLACK_000443] · slack_pm:msg:02377

Page text: p.229 · original PDF

Date
2020-10-25 08:14
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I'm all for science _messaging_ on twitter, but yes, this whole science _by twitter_ gotta stop - it's ridiculous. Ibelieve a certain Fred Hutch researcher hopefully learned that as well...

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-10-25 06:49 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yeah. This really sucks. Dumb. I like the note: 'Whereas all authors agreed on the final manuscript, not every author agrees on every point in the paper.'
  2. 2020-10-25 06:50 Andrew Rambaut open
    @Eddie Holmes The only virus I can think of that alters host behaviour to enhance transmission is rabies and that ispretty extreme (and a hardly a subtle action).
  3. 2020-10-25 07:19 Kristian G. Andersen open
    COVID has put to light the things that desperately need to change/die. PNAS is on that list. Demagogues too. And Stanford.
  4. 2020-10-25 07:41 Robert F. Garry open
    I'd add to Kristian's list TV science "experts" [especially those that fake the disease they are spreading disinformation about], outbreak culture in general and - related to the latter - "science" by Zenado/internet [Yan}/twitter {Chan}. The current iterations of CDC, FDA and WHO also need many changes... As for the PNAS article it's about as useful as the "COVID came from snakes or on a meteorite" papers.
  5. 2020-10-25 08:14 Kristian G. Andersen
    I'm all for science _messaging_ on twitter, but yes, this whole science _by twitter_ gotta stop - it's ridiculous. Ibelieve a certain Fred Hutch researcher hopefully learned that as well...

Full conversation →