COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.212 [SLACK_000426] · slack_pm:msg:02210

Page text: p.212 · original PDF

Date
2020-10-05 14:19
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Kristian G. Andersen
Topics
Furin cleavage site and molecular features

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah, they show that particular point using a couple of different assays, so I think probably true. I agree it's a little counter-intuitive, but probably the binding to hACE2 is generally speaking more optimized for binding to the RBD (soit's inherently a higher affinity binding - no matter the RBD).

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
I agree it's a little counter-intuitive, but probably the binding to hACE2 is generally speaking more optimized for binding to the RBD (soit's inherently a higher affinity binding - no matter the RBD). needs context uncertain explicit hedge acknowledges

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-10-05 13:50 Edward C. Holmes open
    @Kristian Andersen Do you believe the data that "bat SARSr-CoV RBDs showed a higher binding affinity to human ACE2 than to R. sinicus ACE2s". Seems so counter-intuitive.
  2. 2020-10-05 14:19 Kristian G. Andersen
    Yeah, they show that particular point using a couple of different assays, so I think probably true. I agree it's a little counter-intuitive, but probably the binding to hACE2 is generally speaking more optimized for binding to the RBD (soit's inherently a higher affinity binding - no matter the RBD).
  3. 2020-10-05 15:05 Edward C. Holmes open
    Thanks for looking into it. Pretty amazing. Emergence here we come.
  4. 2020-10-05 15:17 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I honestly don't know how we're all not dead already... :skull:

Full conversation →