Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.176 [SLACK_000390] · slack_pm:msg:01818

Date: 2020-09-16 20:18
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

They don't say 'how' at all: "It has accurately predicted where the last three outbreaks would emerge, though not their timing". Err, not a prediction then.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-09-16 20:15 Kristian G. Andersen open

:hankey:
2020-09-16 20:15 Edward C. Holmes open

There was a story about the GVP in The Guardian as well: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/ sep/16/how-to-predict-a-pandemic-worlds-most-dangerous-viruses?CMP=share_btn_tw
2020-09-16 20:16 Edward C. Holmes open

Good for you!
2020-09-16 20:17 Kristian G. Andersen open

"*'Why wait for it?' How to predict a pandemic"* Sounds so simple...
2020-09-16 20:18 Edward C. Holmes

They don't say 'how' at all: "It has accurately predicted where the last three outbreaks would emerge, though not their timing". Err, not a prediction then.
2020-09-16 20:19 Edward C. Holmes open

"Pandemics are like terrorist attacks," he says. "We know roughly where they originate and what's responsible for them, but we don't know exactly when the next one will happen. They need to be handled the same way - byidentifying all possible sources and dismantling those before the next pandemic strikes." Yes, waterboard as many bats as possible.
2020-09-16 20:21 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha, fuck yeah!

Full conversation →