Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.175 [SLACK_000389] · slack_pm:msg:01804

Date: 2020-09-16 19:44
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

This does seem a little incestuous: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/scientists-examine-possibility-covid-leaked-lab-part-investigation/

Links shared

news https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/scientists-examine-possibility-covid-leaked-lab-part-investigation/

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-09-16 18:31 Robert F. Garry open

Alina is tweeting up storm on Yan in real time....
2020-09-16 18:43 Edward C. Holmes open

Just digging the hole bigger and bigger
2020-09-16 18:45 Edward C. Holmes open

Although I really doubt that many people are viewing this stuff.
2020-09-16 19:44 Edward C. Holmes

This does seem a little incestuous: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/scientists-examine-possibility-covid-leaked-lab-part-investigation/
2020-09-16 19:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, having the Grand Wizard of EgoHealth lead that investigation is ridiculous - if there's any connection to the lab, Pete would be implicated (and probably already know about it).
2020-09-16 19:49 Edward C. Holmes open

Will only add fuel to the conspiracy theories. REALLY DUMB!
2020-09-16 19:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, that really doesn't make any sense - that's fishy as hell
2020-09-16 19:54 Edward C. Holmes open

I've no idea what they were thinking. Plus, he's not the best person to do it scientifically.

Full conversation →