Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.108 [SLACK_000322] · slack_pm:msg:01110

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Is this the "Nature Microbiology" paper I have been dodging reporters on today?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-07-27 13:37 Robert F. Garry open

Nice paper coming Andrew! I hope I did not botch the discussion of the phylogenetic trees, etc. to the reporter toobadly.
2020-07-27 14:05 Andrew Rambaut open

Thanks! More stuff to wind up Ebright and the others.
2020-07-27 14:19 Kristian G. Andersen

Is this the "Nature Microbiology" paper I have been dodging reporters on today?
2020-07-27 14:25 Andrew Rambaut open

Yeah. Just some phylogenies, recombination and date estimates of SARS related coronaviruses. Nothing you haven't heard already.
2020-07-27 14:39 Kristian G. Andersen open

Cool! One interesting thing I got from Trevor though - if he tries to date SARS2 via the related viruses (of which we now have a few), he gets a relatively nice signal for 2014/2015. Doesn't mean anything in isolation, but I still keepcontemplating that 'pre' circulation scenario for emergence. They need to go hunt some more viruses in those Yunnan caves!
2020-07-27 14:40 Andrew Rambaut open

It is meaningless to date SARS2 with related viruses - makes no sense.
2020-07-27 14:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

I thought so too, but honing in on specific parts of the genomes that were homologous it seemed like it could bedone - no idea about the details though.