COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.94 [SLACK_000308] · slack_pm:msg:00960

Page text: p.94 · original PDF

Date
2020-07-04 16:51
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Edward C. Holmes
Topics
Wuhan Institute of Virology collaboration

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

You need to read this. I knew about the mine story (it's in a PhD thesis). The key mistake is that they imply that RaTG13/4991 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 which it clearly isn't. And if we except that it suggests that the WIV do not have other bat viruses that could have led to SARS-CoV-2 through experimental manipulation.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
And if we except that it suggests that the WIV do not have other bat viruses that could have led to SARS-CoV-2 through experimental manipulation. quoted / not their view hypothetical conditional framing asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-07-04 16:18 Edward C. Holmes open
    What is happening to the US? Extraordinary.
  2. 2020-07-04 16:33 Edward C. Holmes open
    http://archive.is/7TCsc
  3. 2020-07-04 16:51 Edward C. Holmes
    You need to read this. I knew about the mine story (it's in a PhD thesis). The key mistake is that they imply that RaTG13/4991 is the direct ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 which it clearly isn't. And if we except that it suggests that the WIV do not have other bat viruses that could have led to SARS-CoV-2 through experimental manipulation.
  4. 2020-07-04 17:07 Edward C. Holmes open
    Ebright talking his usual nonsense. People always forget about RmYN02 and why would you passage a virus that you already think might cause human pneumonia?

Full conversation →