COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.51 [SLACK_000265] · slack_pm:msg:00503

Page text: p.51 · original PDF

Date
2020-06-03 15:58
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

It doesn't - but the article explains that it has been watered down apparently.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2020-06-03 15:50 Andrew Rambaut open
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/03/exclusive-coronavirus-began-accident-disease-escaped-chinese/
  2. 2020-06-03 15:53 Edward C. Holmes open
    Ugh.
  3. 2020-06-03 15:54 Robert F. Garry open
    Yeah - forgot about all the unhelpful stuff re the origins - probably a good 5 or 6 more points for the list.
  4. 2020-06-03 15:56 Edward C. Holmes open
    Did you read the paper in question. I don't really see how it supports a lab escape?
  5. 2020-06-03 15:58 Andrew Rambaut
    It doesn't - but the article explains that it has been watered down apparently.
  6. 2020-06-03 15:58 Andrew Rambaut open
    And a new paper is coming out as soon as they find someone to publish it.
  7. 2020-06-03 16:04 Edward C. Holmes open
    Got it. I went straight to the paper. Have you seen the original? I'd love to see what this compelling evidence is.
  8. 2020-06-03 16:05 Edward C. Holmes open
    "Henceforth, those who would maintain that the Covid-19 pandemic arose from zoonotic transfer need to explain precisely why this more parsimonious account is wrong before asserting that their evidence is persuasive, most especially when, as we also show, there are puzzling errors in their use of evidence." Is this us?
  9. 2020-06-03 16:11 Andrew Rambaut open
    Presumably. I see a 40K Altmetric.

Full conversation →