A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Let's take that into the afternoon.
-
Would that change your opinion?
-
It would depend on what data was present. Certainly the pangolin strains were identified, and I think the first paper that was published was in September of 2019, by non-WIV researchers.
-
And who was that?
-
2026-04-10 09:00
Ralph S. Baric
I --
-
What organization?
-
I don't know. The authors were from Chinese groups. We could find the paper, but that was the first report. In fact, the whole genesis around the pangolin strains, these pangolin strains, is confusing because the group that published first had one sequence. And then, if I understand it correctly, those sequences and samples were picked up, I believe, by WIV researchers, or another group, and they published a completely different set of sequences. So one paper is in a very infrequently read journal, and then the other was in Nature.
-
What's the other journal?
-
Again, I can't remember. So there's an DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com issue about -- it's not clear why they found two different virus sequences in the same samples.