COVID-19 Records

Private channel session 381

40 messages over 53m, 2020-09-14 – 2020-09-14.

A “conversation” here is an activity session — a run of messages with under 60 minutes of silence inside it. The channel had no native conversation boundaries.

  1. 2020-09-14 22:54 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.165
    Can someone fill me in - what is the 'Yan Report' and why is it being given consideration?
  2. 2020-09-14 22:57 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.165
    @Kristian Andersen She's the scientist who's been making the round on Fox News (and other conservative media) for months alleging that SARS-CoV-2 came from the lab. She's got decent credentials, so the right is listening. This is her report... Cherry picking and ignoring all recent data.
  3. 2020-09-14 22:59 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.165
    And they say that 'ZC45' is the progenitor. Nuts.
  4. 2020-09-14 23:01 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.165
    They say a lot of things... But yeah, ZC45 was the template... (they might want to look at the alignment again...)
  5. 2020-09-14 23:03 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.165
    3690 nucleotide differences between ZC45 and SC2. That is a lot of engineering.
  6. 2020-09-14 23:05 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.165
    "Accelerated evolution", of course. They _completely_ ignore the new pangolin and bat CoVs (since they're fake). If they had included them, all their arguments go away.
  7. 2020-09-14 23:08 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.165
    I wonder what Jon's angle is then? He emailed me but with nothing but the 'report' in the email.
  8. 2020-09-14 23:10 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.166
    Same here - I'm not sure what his angle is either, but sounds like Eddie talked to him.
  9. 2020-09-14 23:31 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.166
    I just replied to say 3690 nucleotide differences.
  10. 2020-09-14 23:31 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.166
    I was just about ask about how many nt differences there were between ZC45 and SC2. Thanks for that. I think Jon thinks it's shite. He noted all the ifs, buts and maybes. And the smoking gun in underlined bold font.
  11. 2020-09-14 23:31 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.166
    I think they used the conspiracy theory template in Word.
  12. 2020-09-14 23:32 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.166
    That smoking gun is present in RaTG13 as well... So hardly a smoking gun - it's a conserved sequence
  13. 2020-09-14 23:32 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.166
    It is funny that they have killed RaTG13 as evidence so now have to find something else.
  14. 2020-09-14 23:33 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.166
    [Trust me - I looked for these. Hard :wink: ]
  15. 2020-09-14 23:33 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.166
    Yeah - it's remarkable how they dismiss all the new sequences - because they're fake. We have idiots like Alina tothank for that.
  16. 2020-09-14 23:33 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.166
    Now, you see I thought that the conspiracy theory was manipulation from RaTG13 itself from miners? It's just SO hard to keep up!
  17. 2020-09-14 23:34 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.166
    Oh, yes - of course. Followed by accelerated evolution in lungs to create SARS2
  18. 2020-09-14 23:35 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.166
    Where it's been hiding out since that mine thingie, I'm not sure - but probably a freezer or something.
  19. 2020-09-14 23:35 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.166
    Does this mean that these conspiracy theorists think the other conspiracy theorists are conspiracy theorists for suggesting that RaTG13 is real? I need to know.
  20. 2020-09-14 23:35 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.166
    Nah, that's just a conspiracy theory.
  21. 2020-09-14 23:36 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.167
    Just saw this - ```In fact, a Chinese BSL-3 lab (the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre), which published a Nature article reporting a conflicting close phylogenetic relationship between SARS- 35 36 CoV-2 and ZC45/ZXC21 rather than with RaTG13 , was quickly shut down for "rectification" . It is believed that the researchers of that laboratory were being punished for having disclosed the SARS-CoV-2--ZC45/ZXC21connection.``` They don't notice that that you are on that paper, Eddie?
  22. 2020-09-14 23:37 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.167
    So, am I in the conspiracy or not?
  23. 2020-09-14 23:38 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.167
    The rectification was for publishing the sequence, not the link to ZC45.
  24. 2020-09-14 23:40 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.167
    Well, they do cite your CV, so there's that.
  25. 2020-09-14 23:40 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.167
    Do I get a citation?
  26. 2020-09-14 23:40 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.167
    Oh yes
  27. 2020-09-14 23:40 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.167
    I'm all for it then.
  28. 2020-09-14 23:41 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.167
    Ooh. Just saw this bit: ```Since many phylogenetic analyses categorize coronaviruses based on the sequence similarity of the RdRp gene only SARS-CoV-2 and ZC45/ZXC21 are separated into different groups/sub-lineages in phylogenetic studies.``` So they are saying 'they' used RdRp from a different virus to confuse phylogenetics!
  29. 2020-09-14 23:41 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.167
    shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-09-14 at 11.40.57 PM.png
  30. 2020-09-14 23:41 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.167
    Then they constructed RaTG13 with that RdRp as well to act as a decoy.
  31. 2020-09-14 23:41 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.167
    Fuck, that's cunning.
  32. 2020-09-14 23:41 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.167
    But forgot to put the RBD or furin site in.
  33. 2020-09-14 23:42 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.168
    It was a busy day - they had the lab to bleach.
  34. 2020-09-14 23:42 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.168
    They put a restriction site INSIDE the furin site so they can follow the viruses over time - it's all very clever.
  35. 2020-09-14 23:43 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.168
    I wonder if they encoded any secret messages in the synonymous codon usage?
  36. 2020-09-14 23:44 Andrew Rambaut open PDF p.168
    "made in China"
  37. 2020-09-14 23:44 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.168
    Ohhhh - maybe they put "Eddie Holmes" in there
  38. 2020-09-14 23:44 Kristian G. Andersen open PDF p.168
    Now THAT"D be a smoking gun. Actually - we might want to scan to see if there's a "Made in USA" in there - that seems more likely.
  39. 2020-09-14 23:45 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.168
    Made in China would be perfect. Then they'd be moaning about all the cheap foreign imports.
  40. 2020-09-14 23:47 Edward C. Holmes open PDF p.168
    'Kung flu. Patent pending'.