Senior Attorney, NIH Office of the General Counsel
| Authored | 22 |
| Substantive (25+ words) | 22 |
| Threads posted in | 2 |
| Distinct active days | 12 |
| Words authored | 8,434 |
| Received (incl. group broadcast) | 20 |
Received counts include every message sent to a channel this person belonged to. That measures presence, not participation.
10 sentences were extracted and attributed to this person. Most are not their own opinion. Reporting the total as “10 statements” would misrepresent them.
| Person | Medium | Msgs | Span |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kern | 93 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-25 | |
| Amanda Fine | 80 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Lydia Polimeni | 63 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Scott Prince | 61 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| David Lankford | 60 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Crystal Spruill | 57 | 2021-12-01 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Renate Myles | 57 | 2021-12-01 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Haley Spencer | 10 | 2022-01-14 – 2022-01-24 |
Showing: own voice, substantive needs context quoted / not their view all
For example we posted about NIH's ending structural racism effort, and there were comments about Wuhan Institute of Virology and Ivermectin that were hidden for being off topic.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.108 · original PDF · in context
Of course, there's always a chance that a Judge can issue a broad injunction that, say, concludes that the NIH social media pages are public forums, and that no "content-based restrictions" are allowed, i.e. moderating any comments based on subject matter.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.2 · original PDF · in context
If NIH had the resources to manually moderate its social media accounts on a more consistent basis, it would have done so.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.72 · original PDF · in context