Senior Attorney, NIH Office of the General Counsel
| Authored | 22 |
| Substantive (25+ words) | 22 |
| Threads posted in | 2 |
| Distinct active days | 12 |
| Words authored | 8,434 |
| Received (incl. group broadcast) | 20 |
Received counts include every message sent to a channel this person belonged to. That measures presence, not participation.
10 sentences were extracted and attributed to this person. Most are not their own opinion. Reporting the total as “10 statements” would misrepresent them.
| Person | Medium | Msgs | Span |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Kern | 93 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-25 | |
| Amanda Fine | 80 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Lydia Polimeni | 63 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Scott Prince | 61 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| David Lankford | 60 | 2021-11-10 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Crystal Spruill | 57 | 2021-12-01 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Renate Myles | 57 | 2021-12-01 – 2022-01-24 | |
| Haley Spencer | 10 | 2022-01-14 – 2022-01-24 |
Showing: own voice, substantive needs context quoted / not their view all
For example we posted about NIH's ending structural racism effort, and there were comments about Wuhan Institute of Virology and Ivermectin that were hidden for being off topic.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.108 · original PDF · in context
Of course, there's always a chance that a Judge can issue a broad injunction that, say, concludes that the NIH social media pages are public forums, and that no "content-based restrictions" are allowed, i.e. moderating any comments based on subject matter.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.2 · original PDF · in context
In the meantime, I wanted to send you an answer to your question from our last call: Question: Could a decision in this case impact other NIH ICO social media accounts?
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.57 · original PDF · in context
However, the DOJ has this scope on their radar and they will be sure to be extremely clear with the court that this concerns only the two social media pages, and if there was a ruling adverse to NIH it should be limited to these two pages only.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.57 · original PDF · in context
This is why the DOJ sees a broader application to other NIH social media accounts as a small risk.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.57 · original PDF · in context
In the meantime, I wanted to send you an answer to your question from our last call: Question: Could a decision in this case impact other NIH ICO social media accounts?
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.81 · original PDF · in context
However, the DOJ has this scope on their radar and they will be sure to be extremely clear with the court that this concerns only the two social media pages, and if there was a ruling adverse to NIH it should be limited to these two pages only.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.81 · original PDF · in context
This is why the DOJ sees a broader application to other NIH social media accounts as a small risk.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.81 · original PDF · in context
To prove the point that inflammatory comments may dissuade interested citizens from visiting the social media pages: Has the NIH received any complaints about animal rights comments on its social media pages?
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.103 · original PDF · in context
If NIH had the resources to manually moderate its social media accounts on a more consistent basis, it would have done so.
NIH Hid Public Comments Package, p.72 · original PDF · in context