Slack / Private Message Drop — page 580
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000794
← p.579 p.581 → · this page in the original PDF · package
file(s): image.png]
[2021-03-09 15:14:04]
[Robert Garry]
Another thing about Alina's BS - if she thinks there are integrity issues with the pango papers then fine contact the
journals. There is a process for that, which the journals went through. Not getting her way, she escalated, went
public and took to accusing people literally of genocide. At my University this would be a violation of ethics rules,
violating the rights of Tommy, Eddie and a lot of other people. I would recommend without hesitation that she be
fired for crap like that - take that attitude and BS somewhere else.
[2021-03-09 15:59:35]
[Eddie Holmes]
Yes, it's the questioning of the 'integrity' issues that really infuriates me and why I contacted the Broad in the first
place. To avoid elevating my blood pressure and an early death I've held off for now. But if she does it again then
that will be it. I have to say that I was extremely underwhelmed by the Broad.
[2021-03-09 16:23:07]
[Kristian Andersen]
I'm very surprised by how passive Broad has been in all of this. Had she done this at our institution, she would have
been fired - personal attacks are sackable offenses. Rightly so.
[2021-03-09 16:29:41]
[Robert Garry]
[thread - ID: 2021-03-09 12:25:59]
@Kristian Andersen She is also wasting a lot of other people's time driving the false narrative about fake pango /bat
CoV sequences and how SC2 emerged perfectly adapted. Not that other idiots haven't and wouldn't have carried
that water, but she brings the imprimatur of the Broad - and by their passivity - tacit approval.
[2021-03-09 16:57:18]
[Eddie Holmes]
Got this from a friend at EgoHealth. Very interesting. Obviously keep to yourselves: "Apparently the WHO team
spent a fair bit of time matching landmarks from your photos to the market when they visited, and the drain grates
that the raccoon dogs were sitting on top of in your pictures correspond to the places in the market where they found
the lowest CoV Ct values (all of this is still confidential but will be in the report I think). Seems reasonable that those
guys were infected and shedding virus in their feces, as Koopmans thought it was highly unlikely that that level of
CoV RNA would be in those grates from human sources. Unfortunately the Chinese didn't do any source tracing of
any mammals from the market originally (I think they're still claiming it was seafood only), and now all those farms
are apparently coat hanger factories (?), so I don't think that they'll be able to really test that hypothesis. The WHO
team also found frozen raccoon dog/ferret badger (they're unsure and I think are waiting for barcoding) carcasses
still at the market, so it's possible that some of the frozen food detections they've had could have come from the
same source farm or processing plant as the live animals."
[2021-03-09 17:12:23]
[Kristian Andersen]
Very interesting - and, of course, makes a ton of sense. Kinda looking forward to the full report - I'm not convinced
it'll be a total dud :wink:
[2021-03-09 17:23:37]
[Eddie Holmes]
Agreed - seems better than I imagined
The Parisites will explode
[2021-03-09 17:48:39]
[Robert Garry]
That would be good!
[2021-03-09 19:07:11]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/580
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:06056 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 579–580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06057 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06058 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06059 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06060 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06061 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06062 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06063 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06064 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580 |
| slack_pm:msg:06065 | 2021-03-09 | chat message | 580–581 |