Slack / Private Message Drop — page 347
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000561
← p.346 p.348 → · this page in the original PDF · package
I think maybe he's not very good with numbers.
[2020-12-29 09:23:35]
[Robert Garry]
More fun with cats.
[2020-12-29 09:24:17]
[Robert Garry]
```Denmark cats: 69-70 deletion plus Y454F RBD mutation seen in some mink. Do not know the relationship of the
cats - maybe all the same cat or cat house.
Cat from Greece V1104L
Lion 3 and 4 Y505H RBD mutation, not present in Lion 2. Lion 2 Q616R mutation not seen in Lions 3,4. Lions 3, 4
A626I, Lion 2 A626T```
[2020-12-29 09:31:31]
[Robert Garry]
SC2 mostly makes the jump to house cats with no changes. However there are some interesting RDB mutations in
some lions (Y505H) and the cat or cats from Denmark (Y454F). The lions also have mutations associated with
Doug,
[2020-12-29 09:34:51]
[Robert Garry]
Alignments: [shared file(s): image.png]
[2020-12-29 09:35:39]
[Kristian Andersen]
Very little onward transmission in cats (presumably), so I wouldn't expect much evolution to happen. Compare that
to a mink farm where the virus gets a chance to spread through a whole population of thousands of animals very
quickly.
[2020-12-29 10:05:16]
[Robert Garry]
In uptown NOLA there are a lot of wild/street cats. Hundreds of cats hang out around the French quarter and the
wharf. I think similar situations in some other countries as well. Certainly not the same intense situation as a mink
farm, but I could see an opportunity for spread amongst the feral cats in NOLa - elsewhere dunno. That being said I
agree that in the Danish cat [looking at the GSAID metadata seems that there is only one - all the same sequence]
the 69/70 deletion and Y454F mutations were probably in this cat's human already - just not clear to me if as minor
or major species. The alternative is selection after the species jump, but this seems less likely, but maybe that's just
my bias. Lions in a zoo yes no onward transmission except to other lions. Clearly two different sequences in the
three lions, which makes me think there might be some selection during the species jump or two independent
transmissions. The latter seems less likely. Lions 3 and 4 sharing their virus.
[2020-12-29 10:24:17]
[Robert Garry]
It's a *very* important distinction you're making. SC1 from eating a civet - basically one step for the adaptor
mutations. The dog and the house cats mostly no changes, with the exception of the Danish cat [go figure]. The
serially passaged cats had some mutations fixed. The lab mice forced passage and it took several steps to get the
adaptive mutations. However, not so much with the ferret transmission in the aerosol study above - this looks
basically one step for get the RBD and FCS adaption. Maybe this is a good case of selection after limited replication
in the animal. The Erasmus group is pretty sound so they probably would have sequenced their virus stock to a
pretty good depth I would hope.
[2020-12-29 12:12:59]
[Robert Garry]
WELL - there's a dog with P681H hCoV-19/dog/USA/TX-TAMU-077/2020|EPI_ISL_699508|2020-07-28 and another
with Q675H hCoV-19/dog/Italy/Dog399-20BA/2020|EPI_ISL_730652|2020-11-04.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/347
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:03647 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 346–347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03648 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03649 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03650 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03651 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03652 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03653 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03654 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |
| slack_pm:msg:03655 | 2020-12-29 | chat message | 347 |