Slack / Private Message Drop — page 3
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000217
← p.2 p.4 → · this page in the original PDF · package
I don't follow - "The mutation Spike D614G is of urgent concern". Frankly, my concern over the virus has not really
changed one jot over this mutation. D614 was associated with a huge epidemic in China that was only controlled
through a severe lockdown and don't see any difference in G614.
[2020-05-01 02:51:12]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Yes. It is bollocks. Looking at the Sheffield clinical data too - very weak. We are preparing a rebuttal based on the
UK data. This paper will be going to Science I would imagine. Would be good to rebut it before review.
[2020-05-01 02:58:03]
[Eddie Holmes]
[thread - ID: 2020-05-01 02:58:03]
Cell I believe. Get your retaliation in first. Excellent.
[2020-05-01 03:00:42]
[Eddie Holmes]
This one is a corker. I noticed it because MaRNAV-1 is my Plasmodium narnavirus of which I am very proud. No
need to read beyond the 3rd paragraph of the Abstract: [shared file(s): Mehta2020.pdf]
[2020-05-01 04:53:22]
[Robert Garry]
From Korber2020 "Thus, this mutation might be conferring resistance to protective D614-directed antibody
responses in infected people, making them more susceptible to reinfection with the newer G614 form of the virus.
Alternatively, the advantage might be related to the fact that D614 is embedded in an immunodominant ADE epitope
of SARS-CoV (Wang et al., 2016), and perhaps the G614 form can facilitate ADE." This part is "bollocks."
Reinfection - not happening. ADE during a primary infection? There are indeed some "funny" things about the
antibody responses to NCoV-19, but this is way way out on a very thin limb.
[2020-05-01 07:49:21]
[Andrew Rambaut]
UK clusters by duration: [shared file(s): image.png]
[2020-05-01 07:50:08]
[Andrew Rambaut]
and numbers of sequences: [shared file(s): image.png]
[2020-05-01 07:51:05]
[Andrew Rambaut]
[thread - ID: 2020-05-01 02:58:03]
@Eddie Holmes Yes. Funny that - just got it to review. Will turn it down (on the basis I am already writing a rebuttal
to their preprint).
[2020-05-01 08:23:13]
[Kristian Andersen]
Clearly no difference...
[2020-05-01 08:26:59]
[Andrew Rambaut]
```Ref.: Ms. No. THEIJID-D-20-01291
The 5' UTR of SARS-CoV-2 seems to be genetically unique; implications for improved molecular diagnostics and
treatment strategies
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Dear Professor Rambaut,
You may remember that on 22 Apr 2020 I asked if you would be able to review the above manuscript for us. I have
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/3
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:00012 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 2–3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00013 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00014 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00015 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00016 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00017 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00018 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00019 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00020 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3 |
| slack_pm:msg:00021 | 2020-05-01 | chat message | 3–4 |