Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.3 [SLACK_000217] · slack_pm:msg:00013

Date: 2020-05-01 02:51
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes. It is bollocks. Looking at the Sheffield clinical data too - very weak. We are preparing a rebuttal based on theUK data. This paper will be going to Science I would imagine. Would be good to rebut it before review.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-05-01 02:26 Edward C. Holmes open

I don't follow - "The mutation Spike D614G is of urgent concern". Frankly, my concern over the virus has not really changed one jot over this mutation. D614 was associated with a huge epidemic in China that was only controlled through a severe lockdown and don't see any difference in G614.
2020-05-01 02:51 Andrew Rambaut

Yes. It is bollocks. Looking at the Sheffield clinical data too - very weak. We are preparing a rebuttal based on theUK data. This paper will be going to Science I would imagine. Would be good to rebut it before review.
2020-05-01 02:58 Edward C. Holmes open

Cell I believe. Get your retaliation in first. Excellent.
2020-05-01 03:00 Edward C. Holmes open

This one is a corker. I noticed it because MaRNAV-1 is my Plasmodium narnavirus of which I am very proud. No need to read beyond the 3rd paragraph of the Abstract: [shared file(s): Mehta2020.pdf]

Full conversation →