Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted) — page 137
of 155 pages
← p.136 p.138 → · this page in the original PDF · package
DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
are really good and the spike is really good.
Polymerase has gaps in it. We can't close those gaps
based on their sequence, using all kinds of different
program to try to do it. Now, they may have an in-house
program that they used, but personally I think they used a
reference sequence and they guessed, to fill the gaps.
That's my gut feeling.
MS. SALAZAR: And I had asked you if you had ever not
published something. So that's part of what happened in
this case. I understand it was partially uploaded and then
it was under embargo. So have you ever had a sequence or
something under embargo that then you withdrew? I just
want to make sure that my initial question of you didn't
publish anything is complete, because I understand that you
can submit something.
DR. BARIC: You can pull it off, yeah. I don't
believe we have ever, no. I mean, why would we? We were
using public sequences to build viruses. It's not like we
were doing this de novo.
MS. SALAZAR: Okay.
DR. BARIC: Just to let you know, we have ordered a
molecular clone for RaTG13. That genome is heavily
debilitated. We eventually isolated it. We have not
finished submitting the paper.
MS. SALAZAR: Okay. And when did you isolate it?
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/baric_ti/137
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| baric_ti:utt:01133 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 136–137 |
| baric_ti:utt:01134 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 137 |
| baric_ti:utt:01135 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 137 |
| baric_ti:utt:01136 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 137 |
| baric_ti:utt:01137 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 137 |
| baric_ti:utt:01138 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 137–138 |