Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted) — page 136
of 155 pages
← p.135 p.137 → · this page in the original PDF · package
DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
meets has got to exceed what I do by at least 100-fold. So
I would be shocked if he felt that he knew me closely,
because that's not true. That's just not true.
MS. SALAZAR: Did you have a copy of RaTG, the genome
before 2020?
DR. BARIC: No. Yeah, so that was first published in
2013 as a sequence fragment, that I didn't notice. And
then they came out with a sequence, I think, in, what,
2017, 2018, somewhere around there. It did not catch my
notice. I mean, oftentimes, every once in a while we do
searches on sequences, to see if there's anything
interesting out there that we might want to work on. But
it didn't catch our attention. So it didn't come to my
attention fully until they published their paper in January
of 2020.
And so I agree with people like Elaine Chen and others
that have looked at the sequence information around that
virus and say that I don't know. Like she has reported, we
could not recreate the full-length sequence that they
provided, based on the sequence information that they
provided. There were gaps, in other words. It was not
complete. Some of it was very good, where they had good
coverage, so they had a lot of coverage of that particular
chromosome and then they cloned out a specific plasma DNA
of that region and sequenced it. So there are regions that
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/baric_ti/136
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| baric_ti:utt:01131 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 135–136 |
| baric_ti:utt:01132 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 136 |
| baric_ti:utt:01133 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 136–137 |