Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1117 [SLACK_001331] · slack_pm:msg:11661

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Agreed. Although she was _very_ specific about a few things we had to include, including the possibility of reverse zoonosis.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-05-28 13:25 Edward C. Holmes open

Joel took control of the other paper which was fine apart from the blatant mis-positing of commas.
2022-05-28 13:48 Robert F. Garry open

Been there too - the stuff that gets added usually has been said somewhere else and said better. Or, it's unnecessary. Maybe @Kristian Andersen can put a lock on...
2022-05-28 14:05 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's in Mike's hands right now because stuff still had to be added in response to new analyses and the reviewers. Once he's done I'll go in and :scissors: - I'm not worried about length
2022-05-28 14:13 Edward C. Holmes open

Trying to anticipate what Caroline wants is not the way to write the paper. Stick to what the science says.
2022-05-28 14:17 Kristian G. Andersen

Agreed. Although she was _very_ specific about a few things we had to include, including the possibility of reverse zoonosis.
2022-05-28 14:41 Robert F. Garry open

Just need to land this plane...getting there.