Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.1111-1112 [SLACK_001325] · slack_pm:msg:11602

Page text: p.1111, p.1112 · original PDF

Date: 2022-04-30 10:49
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry
Topics: Lab-leak / accidental release hypothesis

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I don't agree with this summary by exLLer MC.. And JC's BINGO would not be my response. What happened is that WE threw out a bunch of scenarios - many people on the call trashed us for even considering Lab Leak. Franky the most substantive thing I took away was that we needed to be circumspect about the computartional prediction ofO-linked glycans, which we were. [shared file(s): image.png]

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
What happened is that WE threw out a bunch of scenarios - many people on the call trashed us for even considering Lab Leak.	needs context	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

What happened is that WE threw out a bunch of scenarios - many people on the call trashed us for even considering Lab Leak.

needs context

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-04-30 10:49 Robert F. Garry

I don't agree with this summary by exLLer MC.. And JC's BINGO would not be my response. What happened is that WE threw out a bunch of scenarios - many people on the call trashed us for even considering Lab Leak. Franky the most substantive thing I took away was that we needed to be circumspect about the computartional prediction ofO-linked glycans, which we were. [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-04-30 10:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

Everything said on the call we had already internally discussed and considered. Full stop. There's nothing more to it- other than sour grapes from Baric.
2022-04-30 11:06 Robert F. Garry open

100%
2022-04-30 11:09 Robert F. Garry open

Plus, the call was explicitly private/confidential as it should have been. Everyone on the call signed uo for thatstipulation.
2022-04-30 11:17 Robert F. Garry open

Another black mark from me for Jesse - that call was confidential too. Yet he felt the need to blast out with his own spin. eBan failed to mention she was publishing JB's notes and you and I were left to say basically that we weren't going to discussdetails about a confidential call with heads of NIH. NO opportunity to respond to JB's BS.

Full conversation →