Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1104 [SLACK_001318] · slack_pm:msg:11519

Date: 2022-04-11 21:14
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Ian has access to the PO GDoc... Given his erratic behavior as of late, should I cut him off? He only has access tothe main document (including, of course, version history).

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-04-11 21:14 Kristian G. Andersen

Ian has access to the PO GDoc... Given his erratic behavior as of late, should I cut him off? He only has access tothe main document (including, of course, version history).
2022-04-11 21:26 Edward C. Holmes open

Cut him off.
2022-04-11 21:28 Kristian G. Andersen open

Will do.
2022-04-11 21:29 Kristian G. Andersen open

Also, I just noticed something quite interesting going back to this: https://andersenlab.slack.com/files/UT3183GLT/F023HDS9CQ3/peter_daszak_who___china_joint_study_report_fo r_eddie_holmes.pptx [shared file(s): Peter Daszak WHO & China joint study report for Eddie Holmes.pptx]
2022-04-11 21:30 Kristian G. Andersen open

That's the same slide deck (or similar) to the one from VF: https://downloads.vanityfair.com/ecohealth-alliance/peter-daszak-powerpoint.pdf

Full conversation →