Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1101 [SLACK_001315] · slack_pm:msg:11480

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

No, that's a complete fabrication. I'm going to challenge him in on it.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-04-01 20:47 Edward C. Holmes open

Again, Jesse's preprint included an email FOIAd from NIH from a Chinese group without their permission, for which they had no right to reply and which wasn't even about the data in hand. Who's the bully?
2022-04-01 21:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

Morally bankrupt. That's what's so unbelievable about "poor Jesse" - have any of these people thought for a moment about the "poor" people he's accusing? Which Bob and I had the nerve to point about? I'm sorry, buddy, but it's the other way around- keep playing the victim all you want.
2022-04-01 21:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

To my previous point - Eddie, do you remember Ian mentioning anything about GOF?
2022-04-01 21:50 Edward C. Holmes

No, that's a complete fabrication. I'm going to challenge him in on it.