COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1100 [SLACK_001314] · slack_pm:msg:11471

Page text: p.1100 · original PDF

Date
2022-04-01 17:37
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Can't see anything... [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2022-04-01 17:08 Kristian G. Andersen open
    I missed this note from Ian. He didn't even bring this up once, did he? So just an outright lie? [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-01 at 17.07.05.png]
  2. 2022-04-01 17:29 Robert F. Garry open
    not once - out-right lie.
  3. 2022-04-01 17:30 Kristian G. Andersen open
    @Eddie Holmes and @Andrew Rambaut do you agree?
  4. 2022-04-01 17:37 Andrew Rambaut
    Can't see anything... [shared file(s): image.png, image.png, image.png]
  5. 2022-04-01 17:40 Andrew Rambaut open
    Looking at the edits now (in case there was anything added and removed). Actually Ian made a lot more edits than Iremembered...
  6. 2022-04-01 17:45 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Oh yeah, he actually did - quite a number of them pretty good. Important to get that right - because that's definitely not what I remember.As for the GOF though, he's lying. We also have this: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-04-01 at 17.40.44.png]
  7. 2022-04-01 17:55 Andrew Rambaut open
    Yeah but we probably don't want to say 'he didn't warn us' because that just sounds like we didn't know or didn't agree.
  8. 2022-04-01 18:01 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Definitely not. But here's the thing - the work at the WIV is _exactly_ why we considered the lab leak in the first place! I knew about all the work in BSL-2 - chimeric viruses, cultures, etc - but it seems like Ian didn't. Plus, no GOF at the WIV.

Full conversation →