Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1089 [SLACK_001303] · slack_pm:msg:11340

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yes, but the subpoena has no jurisdiction over me either.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
Yes, but the subpoena has no jurisdiction over me either.	needs context	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

Yes, but the subpoena has no jurisdiction over me either.

needs context

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-02-14 14:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

If any of your councils would like to connect with our folks, lemme know and we can connect them.
2022-02-14 15:01 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks. I think my side will leave it as they have no jurisdiction over me.
2022-02-14 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah - just keep in mind what that could mean for a future subpoena.
2022-02-14 15:03 Kristian G. Andersen open

(as opposed to a simple letter stating a few simple facts - which will show that you are corroborating and something you can point to at a later date)
2022-02-14 15:04 Edward C. Holmes

Yes, but the subpoena has no jurisdiction over me either.
2022-02-14 15:04 Kristian G. Andersen open

Correct - however, I don't know how that could affect future travel, grants, etc.
2022-02-14 15:09 Edward C. Holmes open

I'll testify under a subpoena but I'm not responding to these pathetic accusations from a foreign power. Would be the same for the US, China, Italy, Argentina etc.
2022-02-14 15:10 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup, totally fair - and would probably also be my choice if it wasn't for the fact that I live in this banana republic.
2022-02-14 15:12 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, you're in a different position