Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1089 [SLACK_001303] · slack_pm:msg:11336

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

If any of your councils would like to connect with our folks, lemme know and we can connect them.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-02-14 14:43 Edward C. Holmes open

https://twitter.com/thackerpd/status/1493321839866748935?s=20&t=cQ0lhmCOPvLrFvDnWdD_Qg
2022-02-14 14:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

Good God these people are idiots.
2022-02-14 14:57 Edward C. Holmes open

Thacker is about the worst.
2022-02-14 14:58 Kristian G. Andersen

If any of your councils would like to connect with our folks, lemme know and we can connect them.
2022-02-14 15:01 Edward C. Holmes open

Thanks. I think my side will leave it as they have no jurisdiction over me.
2022-02-14 15:02 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah - just keep in mind what that could mean for a future subpoena.
2022-02-14 15:03 Kristian G. Andersen open

(as opposed to a simple letter stating a few simple facts - which will show that you are corroborating and something you can point to at a later date)
2022-02-14 15:04 Edward C. Holmes open

Yes, but the subpoena has no jurisdiction over me either.