Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1075 [SLACK_001289] · slack_pm:msg:11210

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

(unless they later request them via a subpoena - then all bets are off)

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
(unless they later request them via a subpoena - then all bets are off)	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

(unless they later request them via a subpoena - then all bets are off)

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-24 14:55 Edward C. Holmes open

I'd put them off for as long as possible. There's nothing in any of this and who knows what we will be debating inNovember. 10 months is long time in politics.
2022-01-24 14:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

That's unfortunately not how these things work - once they take the House they'll look at all the various requests and say "alright folks, what's missing". This'll be on top of their list for certain (several of the folks we have on outside council have worked in the House - on both sides - so they have good intel). Hoping it'll go away is like hoping COVID-19 will go away - it won't, and if they get cross, it only gets worse. I'll keep you posted on what I learn on Wednesday.
2022-01-24 15:15 Edward C. Holmes open

I'm not saying it will go away but I wouldn't give them anything now. I don't see what that achieves. My University will want all my emails redacted.
2022-01-24 15:16 Kristian G. Andersen open

They won't be getting any emails, that's for sure.
2022-01-24 15:16 Kristian G. Andersen

(unless they later request them via a subpoena - then all bets are off)