Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1073 [SLACK_001287] · slack_pm:msg:11194

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

And so what if Fauci and Collins had commented on a paper that was about to be sent to peer review? Not sure what law that has broken.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-24 11:37 Edward C. Holmes open

Mine have been appealed multiple times and one has ended up in court so I think they should keep blocking. Plentyof evidence of the harm this is all doing.
2022-01-24 11:39 Kristian G. Andersen open

I hope the universities will keep fighting back and not release these (completely irrelevant) email threads. There's absolutely nothing in any of them (quite the opposite), but they'll be red meat for the nutters.
2022-01-24 11:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

And, key here - red meat = dangerous. I mean, do they need any more proof than the multiple death threats against everybody involved, included specific plans to assassinate Tony Fauci? We're on that same list.
2022-01-24 12:07 Edward C. Holmes

And so what if Fauci and Collins had commented on a paper that was about to be sent to peer review? Not sure what law that has broken.
2022-01-24 12:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

That too is a very important point.
2022-01-24 12:08 Kristian G. Andersen open

I _do_ wonder when Fauci realized there was a NIAID sub-contract to the WIV - probably late Feb/Mar. I very seriously doubt he had any clue when we first talked
2022-01-24 12:09 Edward C. Holmes open

No clue I'm 100% certain.