Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1073 [SLACK_001287] · slack_pm:msg:11191

Date: 2022-01-24 11:37
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Edward C. Holmes

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Mine have been appealed multiple times and one has ended up in court so I think they should keep blocking. Plentyof evidence of the harm this is all doing.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-24 11:37 Edward C. Holmes

Mine have been appealed multiple times and one has ended up in court so I think they should keep blocking. Plentyof evidence of the harm this is all doing.
2022-01-24 11:39 Kristian G. Andersen open

I hope the universities will keep fighting back and not release these (completely irrelevant) email threads. There's absolutely nothing in any of them (quite the opposite), but they'll be red meat for the nutters.
2022-01-24 11:41 Kristian G. Andersen open

And, key here - red meat = dangerous. I mean, do they need any more proof than the multiple death threats against everybody involved, included specific plans to assassinate Tony Fauci? We're on that same list.
2022-01-24 12:07 Edward C. Holmes open

And so what if Fauci and Collins had commented on a paper that was about to be sent to peer review? Not sure what law that has broken.
2022-01-24 12:07 Kristian G. Andersen open

That too is a very important point.

Full conversation →