Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1073 [SLACK_001287] · slack_pm:msg:11185

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

FWIW, the US doesn't care about Jeremy and he seems to be able to fight back effectively in the UK press.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-24 08:35 Andrew Rambaut open

Just to let you know - My FOI-refusal has been appealed (no surprises) so for this stage the Information Commissioner needs to see the emails (they will not be released from there - if they overturn the refusal then itwould come back to us for redaction etc.). I did notice one or two that haven't come out through the NIH route that would certainly be latched on to: [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-24 08:37 Kristian G. Andersen open

A single word change from Jeremy.... Oh, the scandal!
2022-01-24 08:38 Andrew Rambaut open

We can say that Jeremy only microedited
2022-01-24 08:39 Kristian G. Andersen

FWIW, the US doesn't care about Jeremy and he seems to be able to fight back effectively in the UK press.
2022-01-24 08:57 Andrew Rambaut open

Yup
2022-01-24 08:57 Andrew Rambaut open

Also Jeremy is an actual virus expert in his past life
2022-01-24 08:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup. And to be honest - this whole email thread clearly shows that he played _no_ role in shaping or editing the paper. He had the chance to chime in with substantial suggestions/edits, and he didn't.
2022-01-24 08:59 Andrew Rambaut open

And shows that Fauci and Collins had nothing to do with it.