Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1071 [SLACK_001285] · slack_pm:msg:11166

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I suspect deep throat has surfaced and is working with Chan and eDim.... [shared file(s): image.png]

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-23 09:47 Robert F. Garry

I suspect deep throat has surfaced and is working with Chan and eDim.... [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-23 10:01 Kristian G. Andersen open

Nah, she's just going with the FOIA here - she's got no clue. Somebody must have paid her well to keep going at Proximal - the problem is, a lot of people (scientists) are actually listening to her, which is mind blowing. If people can't look at this and say, "wait, that doesn't make any sense", there's nothing I can do to help them.
2022-01-23 10:12 Robert F. Garry open

Not so sure - she and Baric along with Relman were on a Republican /David Asher teleconference where the Science letter was conceived. Baric definitely playing both sides so he might be feeding her clues.
2022-01-23 10:18 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, that's true - might be something to it.
2022-01-23 10:20 Andrew Rambaut open

On the other hand DT was very much from the it was definitely not lab point of view - i.e., the non-cov amateurs came to the conference call thinking it might be lab but were told what the truth was by actual experts