Slack / Private Message Drop — page 1071

No difference between public and private. [2022-01-21 16:34:03] [Kristian Andersen] Nope - that's a favorite little lie of theirs though. [2022-01-21 16:34:13] [Robert Garry] True - I'm sure she, Relman eDim etc are monetizing this in other ways... [2022-01-22 07:19:22] [Robert Garry] Not sure that this is one that we should just ignore. [shared file(s): image (7).png] [2022-01-22 07:27:05] [Robert Garry] When Rand Paul told Tony that PO1 an "opinion piece" I knew that eDim was the one pulling Paul's chains.... [2022-01-22 11:45:42] [Eddie Holmes] Yes, I agree - that has definitely crossed the line. [2022-01-23 08:29:19] [Robert Garry] Chan is definitely slandering and libeling us... [shared file(s): image.png] [2022-01-23 09:47:14] [Robert Garry] I suspect deep throat has surfaced and is working with Chan and eDim.... [shared file(s): image.png] [2022-01-23 10:01:54] [Kristian Andersen] [thread - ID: 2022-01-23 10:01:54] Nah, she's just going with the FOIA here - she's got no clue. Somebody must have paid her well to keep going at Proximal - the problem is, a lot of people (scientists) are actually listening to her, which is mind blowing. If people can't look at this and say, "wait, that doesn't make any sense", there's nothing I can do to help them. [2022-01-23 10:12:29] [Robert Garry] Not so sure - she and Baric along with Relman were on a Republican /David Asher teleconference where the Science letter was conceived. Baric definitely playing both sides so he might be feeding her clues. [2022-01-23 10:18:36] [Kristian Andersen] Yeah, that's true - might be something to it. [2022-01-23 10:20:39] [Andrew Rambaut] On the other hand DT was very much from the it was definitely not lab point of view - i.e., the non-cov amateurs came to the conference call thinking it might be lab but were told what the truth was by actual experts [2022-01-23 10:22:21] [Kristian Andersen]