Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1057 [SLACK_001271] · slack_pm:msg:11041

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

That would have been a good idea - she's a pretty big fan of the Zoonati BTW.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-13 13:36 Andrew Rambaut open

(in NM)?
2022-01-13 13:37 Robert F. Garry open

17Mar20 - my daughter's birthday...
2022-01-13 13:38 Andrew Rambaut open

Did you give her a poster of the paper with its Altmetrics score?
2022-01-13 13:45 Kristian G. Andersen open

Not quite sure what the "rumination" is about... But I'm sure he'll ask you (he mentioned that he was going to send itto you and Bob once he got Eddie's and my edits back). Here's the full "rumination" section, with my notes [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at 1.44.10 PM.png]
2022-01-13 13:45 Robert F. Garry

That would have been a good idea - she's a pretty big fan of the Zoonati BTW.
2022-01-13 13:46 Edward C. Holmes open

Will do. I've not even opened the document yet.
2022-01-13 13:46 Kristian G. Andersen open

Gus is very interested in understanding the FULL editing history of PO... (and no - I'm not going to answer him...) [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-13 at 1.45.52 PM.png]
2022-01-13 13:47 Kristian G. Andersen open

To say that we submitted PO on Feb. 2 - I mean, come on man... Seriously.
2022-01-13 13:47 Andrew Rambaut open

Looking at the edits on virological - I think we may have posted it privately on the 16th, made a few more tweaks and then made it public on the 17th.