Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1053 [SLACK_001267] · slack_pm:msg:11006

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

True - which makes it all the more important to really nail the Science papers...

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-13 07:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, the email chains - and especially the Google Doc history - show the whole process very well. It's exactly whatwe have always been saying. But only reasonable people would understand that - i.e., <50% of the US public.
2022-01-13 07:53 Kristian G. Andersen open

I expect ALL of this will become public at some point. The GOP will take the house later this year by which time myself and Bob will find ourselves subpoenad to appear in front of congress. Because of this, it's _ultra_ importantwe don't give them any further fodder - just pointing out when they're wrong, but without giving any further details than those already known.
2022-01-13 07:56 Robert F. Garry

True - which makes it all the more important to really nail the Science papers...
2022-01-13 07:59 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup - focus on the science. (plus, we got a grant to write... :wink: )
2022-01-13 08:01 Robert F. Garry open

Yeah - it's so distracting - I have to talk to a local reporter about Mardi Gras/Omicron now - plenty of opportunity toget in more trouble there.
2022-01-13 08:02 Robert F. Garry open

BTW - the Intercept actually said they would do a correction/clarification...
2022-01-13 08:17 Robert F. Garry open

Just got this - oh boy... [shared file(s): image.png]