Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1053 [SLACK_001267] · slack_pm:msg:11005

Date: 2022-01-13 07:53
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen
Topics: Congressional oversight

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I expect ALL of this will become public at some point. The GOP will take the house later this year by which time myself and Bob will find ourselves subpoenad to appear in front of congress. Because of this, it's _ultra_ importantwe don't give them any further fodder - just pointing out when they're wrong, but without giving any further details than those already known.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
The GOP will take the house later this year by which time myself and Bob will find ourselves subpoenad to appear in front of congress.	own voice, substantive	speaker_own	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

The GOP will take the house later this year by which time myself and Bob will find ourselves subpoenad to appear in front of congress.

own voice, substantive

speaker_own

asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-13 07:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, the email chains - and especially the Google Doc history - show the whole process very well. It's exactly whatwe have always been saying. But only reasonable people would understand that - i.e., <50% of the US public.
2022-01-13 07:53 Kristian G. Andersen

I expect ALL of this will become public at some point. The GOP will take the house later this year by which time myself and Bob will find ourselves subpoenad to appear in front of congress. Because of this, it's _ultra_ importantwe don't give them any further fodder - just pointing out when they're wrong, but without giving any further details than those already known.
2022-01-13 07:56 Robert F. Garry open

True - which makes it all the more important to really nail the Science papers...
2022-01-13 07:59 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup - focus on the science. (plus, we got a grant to write... :wink: )
2022-01-13 08:01 Robert F. Garry open

Yeah - it's so distracting - I have to talk to a local reporter about Mardi Gras/Omicron now - plenty of opportunity toget in more trouble there.
2022-01-13 08:02 Robert F. Garry open

BTW - the Intercept actually said they would do a correction/clarification...

Full conversation →