Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1044 [SLACK_001258] · slack_pm:msg:10923

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Yeah - it's tough being a scientist - considering all those possibilities, following the facts and the data.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-11 12:46 Robert F. Garry open

this is what happened when you get named checked by Rand Paul [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-11 13:00 Kristian G. Andersen open

Hah. Well, at least you didn't say it was "inconsistent with evolutionary theory" Bob :wink:. I don't actually remember this email - I guess you just later realized you were wrong.
2022-01-11 13:05 Robert F. Garry open

yeah - i vaguely remember writing something like that - but wrong - really quite wrong .
2022-01-11 13:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup - definitely wrong. BUT YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO BE WRONG BOB!!! Because, if you are, it's just proof you're lying.
2022-01-11 13:09 Robert F. Garry

Yeah - it's tough being a scientist - considering all those possibilities, following the facts and the data.
2022-01-11 13:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

Wait, looking at this - how did these fuckers get that particular email? It's a private one between the four of us. Did you forward it to anybody? Here's the original [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-01-11 at 1.09.54 PM.png]
2022-01-11 13:11 Kristian G. Andersen open

It's from the "Trying to create a summary...." thread.
2022-01-11 13:13 Robert F. Garry open

I didn't - That's a good question - how did they get that?
2022-01-11 13:15 Kristian G. Andersen open

I don't know... @Andrew Rambaut or @Eddie Holmes - could they have gotten this via your institutions?