Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1043 [SLACK_001257] · slack_pm:msg:10910

Date: 2022-01-11 11:31
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Kristian G. Andersen
Topics: Congressional oversight Proximal Origin paper

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I can see Rand Paul has read our paper too - even mentions Bob by name (starts ~4 mins in): https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1480943104496652297?s=20. Truly reprehensible.

Links shared

social https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1480943104496652297?s=20

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
I can see Rand Paul has read our paper too - even mentions Bob by name (starts ~4 mins in): https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1480943104496652297?s=20.	needs context	speaker_own	questions

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

I can see Rand Paul has read our paper too - even mentions Bob by name (starts ~4 mins in): https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1480943104496652297?s=20.

needs context

speaker_own

questions

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2022-01-11 11:18 Robert F. Garry open

And it's way past time for @NatureMedicine to publish an addendum to Proximal Origin to inform readers about its true origin and history.
2022-01-11 11:18 Robert F. Garry open

no just no
2022-01-11 11:18 Kristian G. Andersen open

Haha, yeah, sure.
2022-01-11 11:20 Robert F. Garry open

Curious thing is that 4$ is the only one who figured out to monetize this origins thingy.
2022-01-11 11:31 Kristian G. Andersen

I can see Rand Paul has read our paper too - even mentions Bob by name (starts ~4 mins in): https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1480943104496652297?s=20. Truly reprehensible.
2022-01-11 11:50 Kristian G. Andersen open

Poor Trevor being wrapped up in all of this - also, I'm sad to see that my usual comrades didn't make the cut. [shared file(s): FI13dpWXEAUs_cA.jpeg]
2022-01-11 12:33 Edward C. Holmes open

He's obviously investigated and presumed I am innocent because I made the cut last year. Phew. [shared file(s): image.png]
2022-01-11 12:34 Edward C. Holmes open

Mind you, George does look dead-on guilty.
2022-01-11 12:36 Kristian G. Andersen open

And he _is_ guilty in the cover up - just not the creation of the virus..

Full conversation →