COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1038 [SLACK_001252] · slack_pm:msg:10850

Page text: p.1038 · original PDF

Date
2021-12-03 09:14
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker
Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I agree with keeping them together ideally. And yes - good to have a call.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-12-03 08:54 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Good points @Andrew Rambaut - and I also think we need to start with the "within market" stuff since that's by far the strongest piece of evidence. We discussed the usage of KDEs with Marc a few weeks back and he was okay with it - but I'm not sure we gave him a fair chance to think hard about it.Should you and I maybe have a chat with Mike this weekend to discuss? I think the two stories should go together since having one paper that absolutely nails it is a lot better than have two that kinda nail it.
  2. 2021-12-03 09:14 Andrew Rambaut
    I agree with keeping them together ideally. And yes - good to have a call.
  3. 2021-12-03 09:16 Kristian G. Andersen open
    Lemme ping Mike.

Full conversation →