Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1037 [SLACK_001251] · slack_pm:msg:10844

Date: 2021-12-03 05:07
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes
speaker: Andrew Rambaut

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I just had a chat with Moritz about this and he agrees about the KDEs - it is not something that any spatial infectious disease epidemiologist would use. I worry it will elicit attacks from people that miss the inherent strength of the signal.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-12-03 05:07 Andrew Rambaut

I just had a chat with Moritz about this and he agrees about the KDEs - it is not something that any spatial infectious disease epidemiologist would use. I worry it will elicit attacks from people that miss the inherent strength of the signal.
2021-12-03 05:07 Andrew Rambaut open

I also think we need to start with by far the strongest piece of evidence and that is the environmental sampling in the market.
2021-12-03 05:08 Andrew Rambaut open

If this causes a problem with Mike then perhaps we should split the papers.
2021-12-03 06:05 Robert F. Garry open

Agree with all the above!
2021-12-03 06:31 Robert F. Garry open

I liked the idea of making the market more of a grid. And, details need to be correct - or as correct as we can get them. I tend to believe that this map of the PCR positives is more accurate than some of the other maps. It alsomatches the table better as it has stall 29 as the 5 pcr positive stall - stall 29 would thus be the back room of theshop that is in Eddie's pic that clearly is labeled stall 28 and 30 in the pic that babar posted. [shared file(s): image.png, holmes 6 street uncropped.jpg]

Full conversation →