Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1020 [SLACK_001234] · slack_pm:msg:10649

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Just never had this many survivors before

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-10-13 13:40 Kristian G. Andersen open

Let's see what we can achieve on our own before moving up the line...
2021-10-13 13:47 Andrew Rambaut open

https://virological.org/t/oct-2021-evd-case-in-drc-linked-to-2018-2020-nord-kivu-evd-outbreak/762
2021-10-13 13:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

What is going on??!!
2021-10-13 13:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

Is there a spill-back reservoir we're missing?
2021-10-13 13:54 Andrew Rambaut

Just never had this many survivors before
2021-10-13 13:54 Andrew Rambaut open

Vaccinated and treated with ABs
2021-10-13 13:56 Edward C. Holmes open

@Kristian Andersen Sorry, but I can't give permission for my emails being released in any form (i.e. even via Jon) because I've been told that will set a precedent. I've had a bunch of FOIAs that want all my correspondence with China. I don't care if they are released without my permission, as in the Fauci set, but I can't formally agree under any circumstances. I also don't think it will help. I'll reply to Jeremy later.
2021-10-13 13:56 Kristian G. Andersen open

The former we have had previously, the latter not.
2021-10-13 13:58 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup, totally understand Eddie (which I hope I made clear). I personally _do_ think there's a way to do it without setting a precedent and that's the advice I have been given - but again, totally understand you (and others) can't agree to it.