Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, pp.1019-1020 [SLACK_001233] · slack_pm:msg:10642

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

@Andrew Rambaut All because of P681R? I doubt it - I think this bugger might have some tricks outside that spike protein we so fondly focus on...

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

Statement	Grade	Attribution	Stance
I doubt it - I think this bugger might have some tricks outside that spike protein we so fondly focus on...	needs context	uncertain explicit hedge	asserts

Statement

Grade

Attribution

Stance

I doubt it - I think this bugger might have some tricks outside that spike protein we so fondly focus on...

needs context

uncertain explicit hedge

asserts

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-10-12 14:48 Kristian G. Andersen open

I guess Richard maybe only emailed Bob and myself... [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-10-12 at 14.47.41.png]
2021-10-12 14:49 Edward C. Holmes open

I never got that
2021-10-12 14:49 Kristian G. Andersen open

What we really need an exposé on is the bullshit 4$Chan and eDim are doing - that's by far the biggest problem here, not you random fat angry guy from Texas sitting on his couch in his underpants while screaming at his screen about the "dumb elites!!"
2021-10-12 15:02 Robert F. Garry open

@Andrew Rambaut Glad you're keeping track :wink: - I lose track - interesting how Delta outcompeted Kappa.
2021-10-12 15:04 Kristian G. Andersen

@Andrew Rambaut All because of P681R? I doubt it - I think this bugger might have some tricks outside that spike protein we so fondly focus on...