COVID-19 Records

Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1017 [SLACK_001231] · slack_pm:msg:10618

Page text: p.1017 · original PDF

Date
2021-10-09 05:45
Type
chat message · slack
recipient
Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker
Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I agree there is nothing harmful in the now famous emails re the Feb 1 conference - most of it is public knowledge anyway withe perhaps the exception of Fouchier's summary - again not harmful.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2021-10-09 05:45 Robert F. Garry
    I agree there is nothing harmful in the now famous emails re the Feb 1 conference - most of it is public knowledge anyway withe perhaps the exception of Fouchier's summary - again not harmful.
  2. 2021-10-09 05:51 Robert F. Garry open
    I also appreciate the point about protecting the harm defense. As much as the Leakers - the anonymous and occasionally anonymous ones - would like to say we attacked them - it's the opposite. Alina and Blooms attacks onus and other scientists have been brutal. I guess this is where Jeremy is coming from, but yes it could backfire, just opening more worm cans.
  3. 2021-10-09 05:59 Robert F. Garry open
    Tulane like Scripps is a private institution. That offers some defense against FoIA. No one can demand internal emails. However, our communications with gov entities like NIH are exceptions and subject to FoIA. I've been FoIA'dmany times regarding NIH grants as a form of harassment instigated by covidfaker. NIH gets the same request and they have to comply - what happens is that they redact everything except for the title and abstract of the grant. Still the harassment works - it makes the NIH ppl uncomfortable and wastes a lot of time.
  4. 2021-10-09 06:01 Robert F. Garry open
    There's another restriction on the FoIA requests - releasing the information unredacted requires the permission ofEVERYONE on the emails and other documents.
  5. 2021-10-09 06:05 Robert F. Garry open
    Thus, when covidfaker gets a slimeball journo to FoIA some of my federal grants (at least 5 times) ppl like Pardis/Harvard also have to sign off. Hence with a stroke of a pen covidfaker puts into play a lot of time wasted forme, tulane, nih and my collaborators.

Full conversation →