Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.1002 [SLACK_001216] · slack_pm:msg:10457

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I'll get onto it. I'm also going to have to chat to the intelligence folk.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2021-09-21 15:25 Kristian G. Andersen open

Getting Linfa's take on this would be great - he's on the grant too and he also hasn't mentioned anything about this.
2021-09-21 15:27 Edward C. Holmes

I'll get onto it. I'm also going to have to chat to the intelligence folk.
2021-09-21 16:02 Robert F. Garry open

Some of the most valuable info is going to come from sorting out the parallels btwn SC1 and SC2. It's ironic that two KEY pieces surfaced in the past few weeks- the hubel civet viruses and the BANAL bat viruses. With SC1 and a littleelbow grease you'll see the adaptions from bat to civet to human and then human to human. With SC2 we'll have all the same genomes except the intermediate host (and I think a good assumption that there is one). In both SC1 andSC2 you've got highly similar N-glycan changes in the NTD followed by very similar and specific RBD changes. It's possible the NTD changes opened the door for the RBD changes. Put the FCS aside - nobody did these previouslyundiagnosed NTD and RBD changes by design.
2021-09-21 16:05 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yup, all important points Bob. As for the glycans - do you have the coordinates?
2021-09-21 16:06 Kristian G. Andersen open

I'm done with my Zoom calls so I'll focus on this for the rest of the day/night.
2021-09-21 16:24 Robert F. Garry open

For SC2 to laos bat 52 its N 30, 74 and 370.